<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Black or White or Both or More?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Zaki Warfel</title>
		<link>http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Zaki Warfel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unify.eightshapes.com/?p=45#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Black helps create a &quot;blind spot&quot; you can easily ignore and focus on the content of the page. For onscreen, that&#039;s better. However, if printing, then the black wastes a lot of ink. 

Perhaps use the White, but have a more visible split in the top portion, using a combination of thick and thin lines:

=========-------------------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black helps create a &#8220;blind spot&#8221; you can easily ignore and focus on the content of the page. For onscreen, that&#8217;s better. However, if printing, then the black wastes a lot of ink. </p>
<p>Perhaps use the White, but have a more visible split in the top portion, using a combination of thick and thin lines:</p>
<p>=========&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Melzer</title>
		<link>http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>James Melzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unify.eightshapes.com/?p=45#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Nathan, I love the black on-screen, but I&#039;m gong to vote for the white one. We have always stuck with a white header and dark separator due to issues with printing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, I love the black on-screen, but I&#8217;m gong to vote for the white one. We have always stuck with a white header and dark separator due to issues with printing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Curtis</title>
		<link>http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unify.eightshapes.com/?p=45#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Steven,

Thanks for your comments. To clarify one aspect, the colors of the deliverable template (the black bar at the top, type and color of annotation overlays, etc) is probably orthogonal to the &quot;Wireframes must be black and white&quot; argument. We&#039;re talking deliverables here, not wireframes (although I disagree with your belief regardless :) ). The user, therefore, is the reader of your PDF (a software engineer, a product manager, etc), not the end customer who traverses your implemented experience or participates in a usability test.

Nathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. To clarify one aspect, the colors of the deliverable template (the black bar at the top, type and color of annotation overlays, etc) is probably orthogonal to the &#8220;Wireframes must be black and white&#8221; argument. We&#8217;re talking deliverables here, not wireframes (although I disagree with your belief regardless <img src='http://unify.eightshapes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). The user, therefore, is the reader of your PDF (a software engineer, a product manager, etc), not the end customer who traverses your implemented experience or participates in a usability test.</p>
<p>Nathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Hoober</title>
		<link>http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hoober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unify.eightshapes.com/?p=45#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Orange. 

Seriously. We use brand blue (actually, several tints of it, to add some fun) and do not have issues with distracting the user. Had to switch to the same design in purple when working as a subcontractor for someone else, when we switched logos to the primary vendor. Similarly, I blew off the legacy Nextel black and went with yellow at Sprint. Makes people happier, at all levels, as far as I can tell. 

But I have never been a big believer in &quot;wireframes must be black and white.&quot;

Ink use? Increasingly, everything is seen on screen, so it doesn&#039;t matter as much as it used to. If you seriously were going to have to print, photocopy and fax, never that much black. No more than 80-90% gray, to make sure the density doesn&#039;t get too high for awful or un-calibrated printers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orange. </p>
<p>Seriously. We use brand blue (actually, several tints of it, to add some fun) and do not have issues with distracting the user. Had to switch to the same design in purple when working as a subcontractor for someone else, when we switched logos to the primary vendor. Similarly, I blew off the legacy Nextel black and went with yellow at Sprint. Makes people happier, at all levels, as far as I can tell. </p>
<p>But I have never been a big believer in &#8220;wireframes must be black and white.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ink use? Increasingly, everything is seen on screen, so it doesn&#8217;t matter as much as it used to. If you seriously were going to have to print, photocopy and fax, never that much black. No more than 80-90% gray, to make sure the density doesn&#8217;t get too high for awful or un-calibrated printers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Detzi</title>
		<link>http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Detzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unify.eightshapes.com/?p=45#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had people complain about printing the black.   WHITE for sure.

C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had people complain about printing the black.   WHITE for sure.</p>
<p>C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: France</title>
		<link>http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>France</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unify.eightshapes.com/?p=45#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I vote for the black, brings out the document content; though I&#039;ve tended to use a contrasting-enough gray for readable metadata.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for the black, brings out the document content; though I&#8217;ve tended to use a contrasting-enough gray for readable metadata.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Campbell</title>
		<link>http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unify.eightshapes.com/?p=45#comment-13</guid>
		<description>While the White is minimal and nice, aesthetically, my focus is taken away from the content. I&#039;d go with the black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the White is minimal and nice, aesthetically, my focus is taken away from the content. I&#8217;d go with the black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Fay</title>
		<link>http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Fay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unify.eightshapes.com/?p=45#comment-12</guid>
		<description>So now it seems multiples are in order.  Black for digital needs and white for printable needs :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now it seems multiples are in order.  Black for digital needs and white for printable needs <img src='http://unify.eightshapes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fisken</title>
		<link>http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fisken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unify.eightshapes.com/?p=45#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say white b/c you know these will get printed - but perhaps you can beef up the font size in the header on the white version for readability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say white b/c you know these will get printed &#8211; but perhaps you can beef up the font size in the header on the white version for readability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://unify.eightshapes.com/general/black-or-white-or-both-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unify.eightshapes.com/?p=45#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Black is sexy! Draws you in to the deck immediately...IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black is sexy! Draws you in to the deck immediately&#8230;IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
